<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Twitter&#8217;s New Re-Tweet Feature Won&#8217;t Catch On</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikedesjardins.net/content/2009/11/why-twitters-new-re-tweet-feature-wont-catch-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikedesjardins.net/content/2009/11/why-twitters-new-re-tweet-feature-wont-catch-on/</link>
	<description>freelance software developer consultant in portland, maine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedesjardins.net/content/2009/11/why-twitters-new-re-tweet-feature-wont-catch-on/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikedesjardins.us/wordpress/?p=292#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Sadly, I think twitters interpretation of the retweet is more like a broadcast my &quot;Fave&quot; feature, kind of competing with favrd and, like you said, missing the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, I think twitters interpretation of the retweet is more like a broadcast my &#8220;Fave&#8221; feature, kind of competing with favrd and, like you said, missing the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedesjardins.net/content/2009/11/why-twitters-new-re-tweet-feature-wont-catch-on/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikedesjardins.us/wordpress/?p=292#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Good thoughts here -- thanks for putting the controvery into the context of earlier revisions.

Uptake will also depend on whether the client applications that power-users rely on adopt the new standard or just continue to use RT or via (or that weird recycle symbol the truly nerdy use ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts here &#8212; thanks for putting the controvery into the context of earlier revisions.</p>
<p>Uptake will also depend on whether the client applications that power-users rely on adopt the new standard or just continue to use RT or via (or that weird recycle symbol the truly nerdy use <img src='http://www.mikedesjardins.net/content/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
